An Oakland-based policy and advancement organisation is alleging that the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges drew up an unlawful regulation more than two decades ago giving excessive power to kinesthesia, in violation of country law.

CCCThe nonprofit organization California Competes this week filed a legal challenge against the regulation, which it claims has obstructed efforts to improve student success rates. The legal maneuver relies on a rarely used section of the land educational activity code (§ 70901.5), allowing any outside organization to challenge regulations drawn up by the Board of Governors. California Competes is run acrossking firsthand activeness past the Board to meliorate its regulations to ensure that locally elected community college trustees accept ultimate authorization.

Community college officials did not annotate direct on the California Competes assertions, but a argument by Vice Chancellor for Communications Paul Feist seemed to affirm the colleges' conventionalities in "shared governance" between faculty and higher trustees. "The Chancellor's Office will review the petition filed by California Competes and respond in a timely manner," said Feist. "California customs colleges value the input of faculty and support constructive shared governance in the pursuit of helping students accomplish their educational and career goals." The Board of Governors has 45 days to answer to the challenge.

California Competes, which is funded by several local and national foundations, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, promotes a range of higher instruction reforms.Members of its council include business organization leaders, local elected officials and policymakers.

Robert Shireman, executive director of California Competes, blamed the regulation, which he alleged gives excessive power to academic senates representing faculty on private campuses, for contributing to a host of problems, including preventing colleges from graduating plenty students to meet the state's higher educational activity needs for the 21st century economic system.

"Illegal regulations increasingly harm our schools and students by creating a tangled bureaucracy that is unresponsive and unaccountable," said Shireman in a argument. "The regulations are non simply illegal, but they accept also contributed to our community colleges' national reputation for dispute and dysfunction."

Michelle Pilati, president of the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges, representing faculty at all 112 community colleges, challenged both the charges of illegality and the declared consequences of the regulation. "The thought that local senates can agree the Board hostage is so astounding, I don't have words for information technology," she said. If that is in fact happening, she argued, it is because the trustees chose to sacrifice control, not because the regulations forced them to do information technology.

Rely on or mutually concur

At the centre of the conflict are provisions in Title 5 of the Education Code allowing local trustees to institute decision-making proceduresouthward that "rely primarily upon on the communication and judgment of the academic senate" or "provide for common agreement with the academic senate," or both.

According to the California Competes petition, "relying primarily" on the academic senate violates AB 1725, a 1988 law that required theast California Community Colleges Lath of Governors – a torso appointed past the governor – to establish minimum standards for local boards of trustees to use when developing their governance procedures. The Lath of Governors misinterpreted the constabulary when they wrote that into the regulation, said Susan Bray, executive director of the Association of California Customs College Administrators. She pointed out that a 1991 legal stance past the Legislative Counsel found that the "regulation is invalid insofar as information technology enlarges the scope" of that department of the Education Lawmaking. [Read the entire opinion in Showroom three of the legal filing.]

Bray says another disturbing trend emerging from the policy is that it'southward affecting accreditation decisions. She noted an argument in the legal filing that says 20 of the 27 community colleges that have been under sanctions by the Accrediting Commission for Customs and Inferior Colleges were cited by the Commission for issues with leadership and governance.

Simply that determination is misguided, according to some community higher policy experts. Dysfunctional governance has nothing to practice with the Title 5 regulations, said Tom Henry, who is currently a special trustee appointed by the Lath of Governors to guide several community colleges every bit they work to keep their accreditation. "Information technology all starts with effective leadership. With potent leadership you tin can accomplish what you need to take accomplished relative to accreditation and fiscal stability. If you don't have that then things break downwardly all around you whether you have a policy or education code or Title 5," said Henry.

He and other opponents of the California Competes petition note that the regulations include provisions for cases where trustees can override the kinesthesia senate and make any policy changes necessary for compelling legal, fiscal or organizational reasons including accreditation.

Cooperation running high

Scott Lay, CEO of the Community College League of California, noted that the legal petition comes during a period of unusually strong cooperation among trustees, faculty and administrators at many community colleges and statewide. The Pupil Success Task Forcefulness, composed of faculty, college presidents, researchers, students and trustees, spent a year developing a widely canonical written report containing some two dozen recommendations that was accepted by the state Legislature. Lawmakers followed it upwardly by passing SB 1456, the Student Success Act of 2012.

"The doom and gloom I've heard admittedly ignores the dramatic changes over the last five years," said Lay, who cited several recent major initiatives including the creation of higher math and English language standards for an Acquaintance'southward degree, priority enrollment for students who set academic goals and pledge to stick with them, creation of accelerated bones skills courses, and development of a customs college transfer degree. "At that place'due south immense creativity and progressive change happening at customs colleges within the construct of this law."

That's all the more reason to modify the regulation, said Susan Bray of the administrators' association, to make certain that while those important decisions are existence made, "we all operate under ane structure," instead of 72 separate interpretations of the regulation by the 72 dissimilar community college districts.

Frank Gornick, chancellor of West Hills Community College District in Coalinga, said a conversation most the regulations targeted by California Competes has been a long fourth dimension in coming. "I don't think we should exist fearful, we should approach it in a positive manner and become a good dialogue going," said Gornick.

Lay agrees that there may exist some tweaking necessary to clarify the regulations, but says "that should be a conversation led by Chancellor Harris and with the community college system, not grenades thrown from the outside maxim here'south the solution for what ails California's community colleges."

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.